You are viewing mnemosynosis


How to Fight a Rumour

FOR ANYONE WHO has ever worried about the power of a vicious rumor, Barack Obama's strategy over the summer [Fight the Smears] must have seemed almost bizarre.


New research into the science of rumors suggests Obama's approach may be a sounder strategy - and the reasons why it makes sense suggest that we misunderstand both how rumors work and why they exist.

By using the tools of evolutionary theory and new approaches to mathematical modeling, researchers are drawing a clearer picture of how and why rumors spread. As they do, they are finding that far from being merely idle or malicious gossip, rumor is deeply entwined with our history as a species. It serves some basic social purposes and provides a valuable window on not just what people talk to each other about, but why.


Our brains aren't terribly adept at distinguishing people who are "actually" important from people who simply receive a lot of attention.


Other than denying a rumor that's true, perhaps the biggest mistake one can make... is to adopt a "no comment" policy: Numerous studies have shown that rumors thrive in environments of uncertainty. Considering that rumors often represent a real attempt to get at the truth, the best way to fight them is to address them in as comprehensive a manner as possible... An effective rebuttal will be more than a denial - it will create a new truth, including an explanation of why the rumor exists and who is benefiting from it.

The more vivid that replacement is, the better [stealing thunder]. When done correctly and early enough in a rumor's lifetime, it can shift the subsequent conversation in beneficial ways. Link [Italics added]

Understanding social reasoning and information exchange is absolutely critical. So many people (especially the intelligentsia) mock and ridicule the habits of 'normals' talking around the water cooler about Britney or Paris. Yet, they too gossip about their collegues, sexual misconduct, political funding decisions and so forth. Mock all you like, but these exchanges build social credibility; the more negatives you know about a highly discussed community member, the more acceptance you can get in the network. Remember that peer acceptance is critical for advancement in every profession.

Social heuristicss such as listening to rumours and including gossips in one's social circle cuts down on the amount of social cognitive processing required by individuals, freeing them to concentrate on other concerns.

The rational strategy is to offer information about individuals relevant to your superiors. Your boss must find you socially valuable to promote you. Of course pure merit can get you quite a way along the food chain. Some professions are better than others at recognising such contributions. Nevertheless, without appreciating the role of gossip, you're unlikely to be invited to the cool kids party.


bolding or italics is much better than underlining, as underlines look like broken hyperlinks.
Don't forget the importance of negativity friendships too - something I'd posted about a while ago, possibly inspired by one of your posts last year, like as not ;) People bond far more over sharing negative opinions - so people will shift allegiances based on who they enjoy sharing negative opinions with more. Understanding this is pretty important in terms of elections, and I have to say all the hilarious negative internet commentary on the Republicans esp Palin, has not only made me much more interested in the US election this year, but made me feel I understand/know/like some people better who have shared commentary - and I'm quite sure I'm not alone there.

There is also something to be said for "no such thing as bad press", I can't find the specific article I know I read a little while back, but the most important thing people are looking for isn't the gossip/accusation itself, it's the response that matters. This goes for personal or business, and on all levels, not just Big Politics - see here for some business specific commentary; in Obama's case, he's responding intelligently and in a forthright manner, instead of trying to obfuscate or mislead. This generally will increase trust and respect.

Edited at 2008-10-13 06:43 am (UTC)
well hi there

i only did philosophy at an undergrad level, but hey. Your blog is interesting. Hopefully you find mine so too.
This is a really good read for me, Must admit that you are one of the best bloggers I ever saw.Thanks for posting this informative article.
hermes handbags Coach handbags hermes birkin handbags hermes purses discount hermes handbags hermes kelly handbags hermes lindy handbags hermes wallets hermes birkin bags burberry handbags hermes handbag coach handbags

July 2014



Powered by